Sunday, November 8, 2009

Crosstour Confusion



OK, we all make errors on occasion and yesterday The Detroit News review of the 2010 Honda Crosstour featured photos of the new European Accord by mistake. The descriptions that "it looks better in person than the photographs" must ring true when, by this morning, the errant photo had been replaced with the real design dud from Honda.

Dodge Viper Logo



Too much time on your hands and this is what happens. The Dodge Viper logo turned upside down and what do you have?



That's dithpicable!!!!!!!

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Still Scary!



Glad you had your camera...



Yes, grandfather is getting along in years but he is keeping up with technology... sort of. This is global GPS if I have ever seen it.



OK, maybe for a leisurely drive to the neighborhood 7-11, but no interstate please.



"No problem. Just continue down Milson road and take a right at Tomeka. The on ramp for I-45 will be on your right, about a quarter mile. You'll have the refrigerator home in no time."

Sunday, October 25, 2009

When accidents aren't accidents.



A single driver on a straight road hits a tree at 70 mph and dies. No skid marks. Dry conditions. Officers at the scene list the cause of death as improper driving. But was it?

Police have long theorized that many such otherwise inexplicable crashes are actually disguised suicides. And many researchers believe that suicides disguised as traffic accidents are far more prevalent than previously thought. However, the information necessary to conclude that the driver's intent was to terminate his/her life is generally unavailable and must be proven. Even when suicide is strongly suspected but a suicide note is not found, the case will be classified an "accident."

While there are few studies to substantiate "autocide," sociologist David Phillips of the University of California, San Diego, offered the most solid evidence yet that a number of suicides deliberately drive to their deaths in the family car.

Phillips' study stemmed from a paper he published in 1974 arguing that some suicides were clearly imitative: in the weeks following a prominent suicide, the number of ordinary Americans taking their own lives rises. Phillips later reasoned that if the automobile was a suicide weapon, traffic deaths should increase after widely reported suicides. He analyzed California traffic fatalities from 1966 to 1973, comparing figures for ordinary weeks with statistics for weeks following suicides that were highly publicized in the state, including those of Playwright William Inge, Japanese Novelist Yukio Mishima and California Wine Maker A. Korbel. Phillips' finding: on the third day after such a suicide, auto fatalities rose by 30%; they leveled off for the week at 9% above normal. "In general," notes Phillips, "the more publicity given to the suicide story, the more the number of auto fatalities rises."

One large-scale community survey among suicidal persons provided the following numbers: "Of those who reported planning a suicide, 14.8% had conceived to have a motor vehicle “accident”. Of all attempters, 8.3% had previously attempted via motor vehicle collision.

A second study (Schmidt, Perlin, Towns, Fisher, & Shaffer 1972) led to considerable speculation that a significant albeit unknown proportion of vehicular deaths classified as accidents are in fact suicides. As they argued, the single-car, single-occupant fatal crash is especially suspect and constitute from 1.6% to 5% of all vehicular fatalities.

Except for the Depression year of 1932, the current suicide rate in the U.S. is the highest in history.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Breaking News We Already Knew.



Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall;
All the king's horses,
And all the king's men,
Couldn't put Humpty together again.

Headlines everywhere this morning are announcing that the government's Auto Task Force was shocked by the financial state of GM and Chrysler.

In a first-person account posted on Fortune's Web site Wednesday, Steven Rattner, head of the Task Force, said he was alarmed by the "stunningly poor management" at the Detroit companies and said GM had "perhaps the weakest finance operation any of us had ever seen in a major company."

GM's board of directors was "utterly docile in the face of mounting evidence of a looming disaster and former GM chairman and chief executive Rick Wagoner and his team seemed to believe that virtually all of their problems could be laid at the feet of some combination of the financial crisis, oil prices, the yen-dollar exchange rate and the UAW," Rattner wrote.

"We were shocked, even beyond our low expectations, by the poor state of both GM and Chrysler. Looking just at the condition of GM's finances and Chrysler's new-car pipeline, the case for a bailout was weak." Rattner said the task force was divided on whether to save Chrysler. Chrysler was poorly run during its alignment with Daimler AG, and "larded up with debt, hollowed out by years of mismanagement, Chrysler under (private equity firm) Cerberus never had a chance."

"But on the other hand, as we surveyed the interconnected web of finance companies, suppliers and related businesses, the potential impact of the likely alternative -- liquidation -- stunned us. We imagined that the collapse of the automakers could devastate the Midwest beyond imagination."

As I have written in earlier posts, GM's gross sales steeply tanked for the past 10 years with a cumulative loss of over $80 billion. How on earth, then, could anyone be shocked at the financial condition of the company? If there was anything surprising, it was Rattner's revelation that Rick Wagoner, delusional and perhaps even psychotic towards the end, actually thought he deserved to stay at GM's helm!

Folks, it's time to get your head out of the sand. GM and Chrysler's chances of survival are less than 50% even after bankruptcy.

GM's response to Rattner? "Looking back doesn't help us with the important work we have in front of us."

Oh yea? Looking back, you might learn how not to run a car company. But that's something we already knew, too.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Top "10" Most Sinister-Looking Cars

This from the editors at Kelly Blue Book via the LA Times. Their comments as to why that particular vehicle was chosen first, and my comments follow in italics. Your comments, please.



Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Piercing eyes and a Darth Vader-like mouth give Mitsubishi's world-beating overachiever a visual bark commensurate with its road-shredding bite.

I agree with this choice. I always thought Mitsu chose a mean look to appeal to the target audience... boy racer, no?



Rolls-Royce Phantom
At more than 19 feet long and 5 feet tall, the Rolls-Royce Phantom is a big car. Its imposing size conspires with glaring eyes and a chrome prison-like grille to create a look that's as menacing as a runaway financial institution.

Not sure I am buying into this one. "Imposing," most definitely. "Menacing?" Maybe if the car was painted black and pulling up to a medieval castle on a moonlit evening, but dove-grey on Venture Blvd. for a noon brunch... not so much.



Cadillac CTS
With well-ordered lines, decorative flashes of chrome and eyes that sometimes seem to be looking down on you, the CTS arouses fear and respect like a high-ranking military officer.

Whaaa...? How is this menacing? The car is obviously grinning. The Camaro would have been a better pick from GM.



Ford F-150 Raptor
Maybe it's looking for a good time instead of a victim, but wide fenders, meaty tires, a flashy optional graphics package and an imposing grille that looks in search of a hide to brand make the Ford F-150 Raptor look absolutely wicked.

I'm going with this one, too. Intimidating, you bet. Just wait until my friends in the Outer Banks get thru jacking this one up.



Audi R8
With a front end resembling one big air intake, the Audi R8 can come across with the ferocity of a flying engine. Its focused gaze is rendered even more intimidating by brawn that allows it to reach 60 miles per hour in 4.4 seconds.

True, and true for the appearance of most Audi's, even the A3.



Mazda MAZDASPEED3
The MAZDA3's smile is more of a menacing grin on the high-performance MAZDASPEED3. Growling with 263 turbocharged horsepower, you can almost hear it saying, in the guttural voice of the Joker from "The Dark Knight": "Ooohhh. You want to play? Come on!"

Clown-like? Yes. As we all know, the new face for the 3 has been relentlessly ridiculed on the blog sites for months for its circus expression. But threatening? I would call it perverse, more like the grin a dirty old man opening his raincoat exhibits exposing himself to school children.



Acura TL SH-AWD
Looking into the rearview mirror, you'll notice how well the Acura TL's raptor-like Xenon High-Intensity Discharge headlights seem to illuminate the road (almost like they're zeroing in on you?).

Since when is "ugly" menacing? Come on guys, this is another "grinner!" Where's the Dodge Challenger in all this?



Infiniti FX50
Looking like a great white shark on wheels, the Infiniti FX50's daunting look comprises angled Bi-Xenon headlights, a gaping, toothy grille and gill-like side vents.

A reasonable pick. Of course, anytime you cantilever the headlights, a car looks hostile. A Mary Kay pink sedan looks ominous with slanted headlights... no?



Mitsuoka Orochi
If the mere thought of snakes makes you shiver, you might find the Mitsuoka Orochi's serpentine stare uncomfortably familiar. Named for a giant mythical Japanese eight-headed snake, the Orochi sports a mouth-like grille, reptilian-looking quad headlights and a wide, triangular-shaped front end that make it appear ready to attack.

In your dreams, perhaps. Who's ever seen one, much less bought one? The most terrifying aspect of this travesty is all the heaping chrome.



Lamborghini Reventon Roadster
The mere sight of a stealth fighter can inspire either extreme excitement or fear and loathing. For those who've come face-to-face with one in attack mode and lived to tell about it, the sight of a stealth-inspired Lamborghini Reventon racing up behind you might be a bit unsettling.

"Unsettling" to the bank account, too.

Small Car. Herculean Accomplishments.

I can think of no car that filled so many holes in a manufacturer's lineup than the Rambler, and did so with such surprising longevity and success. It's an amazing story of living, dying and coming back from the dead that earned this automobile a revered standing in the annals of American car history.

The Rambler was introduced by Nash Motors in the early spring of 1950. It was the brainchild of Nash's president George Mason and became post-war America's first domestic compact. Mason knew there was a segment of the population that would respond to an economical automobile and Nash could make money with it in that segment.

Sitting on a 100-inch wheelbase, the Rambler mimicked the larger Nash senior cars in styling and refinement; most notably the skirted front and rear wheel wells. An odd look today, this design trend captured all the newness a war-weary nation dreamed. First offered only as a 2-door "convertible landau," it featured fixed roof rails and a retractable canvas top. 2-Door coupes, sedans and station wagons all soon followed.



The cars sold well, no doubt the starting price of $1,700 helped.

But the 1950s saw great turmoil in the domestic industry, and independents, such as Nash and Studebaker, were fearful of their future. With limited resources and the huge expense of designing new competitive cars, could they survive against the Big 3?

Driven by those odds, Nash Motors merged with Hudson in 1954 forming American Motors. It was an awkward arrangement, as the aging Hudson line duplicated the Nash line. The Hudson Jet, a competitor to the Rambler, had never sold well.

So the new company co-branded the trusty Nash Rambler with the Hudson logo, and the Hudson dealers would now have a successful compact to sell.

In 1955, the Rambler had a modest face lift and opened up the front wheel wells. An egg-crate grill also refreshed the appearance.



But by the end of 1955, sales of the Rambler had begun to decline. The design was over 5 years old, and newer cars from GM, Ford, and Chrysler made the innocent Rambler look dowdy and out of style. Big cars with heavy chrome were where it was at, and the economical Rambler was lost in the shuffle.

Sadly, the little car was discontinued. Many would miss it.

And our story would end as well, if a nasty economic recession hadn't come about. By 1958, the country's boom times began to vanish. Suddenly the march to "lower, wider and longer" cars fell on deaf ears, and the American public stopped buying it. Ford's Edsel arrived at precisely the wrong time and was dead on arrival. Other large makes floundered.

But George Romney, now president of American Motors, made a surprise addition to the company's '58 line up and reintroduced the lowly Rambler as the "new" Rambler American.



Reviving an obsolete design was unheard of in those days (and still is), but it made sense. Neither time nor money allowed for an all-new design. AMC still had the original Nash tooling, and it had long since been paid for. This allowed the firm to field its import-fighter quickly and cheaply, which promised handsome profits even with low list prices.

And the size slotted in perfectly: a bit bigger than the top-selling foreigners, smaller and thriftier than anything offered by the Big Three. Its low price and good mileage made it a hit, again.

And for another 3 years, The Rambler American continued to sell well. But by 1961 even the management at American Motors realized their mini-gem needed a major overhaul.

But monies were still tight, so a clever restyling, under AMC's styling Vice President Edmund E. Anderson in 1961, kept the aging design reasonably fresh, despite retaining the ancient underpinnings from the original Rambler. The 195.6 cid cast iron six was still standard.

Anderson's restyle resulted in a car that was shorter in its exterior dimensions with an overall length of 173.1 inches, but increased in its cargo capacity. Continuing to ride on the 100-inch wheelbase, the American's new styling was more square (sometimes described as "breadbox") instead of round (or "bathtub"), and the visual connection with the original 1950 Nash model had finally disappeared.





The 1961 model sold well. So well, that a 2-door coupe with the look of a convertible was introduced 2 years later. But in the fast-paced world of automobile stying in the '60s, cars were completely redesigned every two or three years. It was decided that a completely new Rambler American would debut in 1964.

But this concludes a fascinating account of a car that, essentially unchanged except for cosmetic makeovers, was on the showroom floor for over 13 years!

Monday, October 12, 2009

So...How's your day going? #5



Crooks break into your garage to steal your fully-restored '68 vette and fail. Frustrated, they set the garage on fire. The car is totaled. Still think wealth-envy is somebody else's problem?

What was, is new again.



Whether it makes it to production or not, the attractive BB1 is the latest micro-electric prototype from the French manufacturers' Peugeot and Michelin tires. Inspired from Peugeot’s electric VLV from the 1940s, this is probably more closed motorcycle than car, as there is no steering wheel or pedals. Instead, a handlebar controls the direction and speed. The rear-wheel drive automobile can reach 0 to 19 mph in 2.8 seconds and 19 to 37 mph in four seconds, with a top speed of around 65mph, from two electrically-recharged lithium-ion batteries that promise a 75-mile range. It can seat four passengers.

Say what you will, but there is a sea-change coming in transportation... and quicker than you can imagine. Micro city-cars like this are less than a decade from populating American cities. Whether by gasoline prices, car prices or the persuasive success of environmentalists in government, the new world is here... like it or not.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Let's Play Twister

My favorite traveling companion, Marty Thomas, with her mother and I, were traveling to Pinehurst, NC several weeks ago when we unexpectedly happened upon a twister on Interstate One.

We don't have the temperament that mid-westerners have for this sort of event, so tornado chasing wasn't in the cards. But our sense of humor and the thought that we would survive for cocktail hour pulled us through.

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Flight of Fantasy



I feel my "recession" depression is developing very nicely, and thank you for asking. That I still can't get behind the administration's non-cognitive bullshit about "green-sprouts" in the economy and the raft of delusional traders on Wall Street who are running the markets up on "less" bad news, I am still finding joy in the simple things in life.

Like staring at the ceiling... wondering how we are ever going to get out of the mess we are in.

Reality certainly has a way of intruding into our modest hopes these days. That it has taken up major residence in my mind makes me question the obnoxious and phony predictions that all will return to sweetness and light in just the next 6 months. Or six months after that. You hear it from all types of pundits, corporations and, by default, the current administration.

But wishful thinking won't solve a damn thing! A constricted credit market, zombie banks, a dismal housing market (with commercial real estate ready to fall in line), unemployment still rising and consumers too scared to spend is a recipe for a malingering economic stew. And government bailouts, TARP funding, overhauling the heath care network and cap and trade will only exacerbate the situation. Borrowing money we don't have (and can never pay back) while debasing the dollar is not the way for us to solve our current dilemma. You cannot spend your way out of a recession with indebtedness.

What's the answer. In a nation that expects all problems solved in a 30 minute TV drama, Americans don't want to hear the answer. But its going to take something more precious than money.

Its going to take time.

Time to devalue toxic assets and realign our financial priorities. Time to re-balance a shattered real estate market and mop up the mortgage mess. Time to reduce manufacturing capacity and create new industries that actually hire people and create new opportunities for advancement.

But time is not on the side of either Chrysler or General Motors.

Total U.S. auto sales will probably come in around 10m cars for 2009. That contrasts with years like 2006 and 2007 when over 16m were sold. And what are the predictions? No one's really said as much, but I can't imagine with a prolonged economic situation (such as it is) that we will see much more than a 10% improvement in growth for several years ahead.

A tight market to make money in when you are well organized, post-bankruptcy C&GM may well run out of money before they can get their act together and the good times return. Do the American taxpayers even have the patience for another bailout?

GM released these pictures of a future small Buick. Wow, this looks great. But will we ever see it on the showroom floor?

Time will tell.

So...How's your day going? #4













I found this rather attractive collection of recent photos showcasing drivers that were not only smashed, but crashed their vehicles as well. Let's face it, not a good night for any one of them and it looks it.

I'm not going to preach about d&d because we all know what happens. But I do find it amazing that it appears to be occurring with great frequency in spite of the warnings.

Just the other day I read in the paper about two Virginia Beach men in a Dodge Viper that crashed at one in the morning. Alcohol and speed were the culprits. That they weren't killed was a miracle. How, may I ask, do you mix booze, a viper and 1am and not have this kind of outcome?

Still want to drink and drive?

The fellow below has found the perfect solution.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Post C4C Sales Results



(Click on the chart for a larger version)

I created this chart to graphically illustrate the current auto sales percentages in September 2009 as opposed to last year at this time. It paints a picture that should come as a surprise to absolutely no one still remotely connected to reality.

The Korean upstarts continue to gain market share at the expense of the entrenched, mainstream old-guard, of which Toyota and Honda are firm members.

What do the numbers tell us?

1. That automobile buyers have dwindling loyalties and will easily switch makes or manufacturers to get a better product.

2. That in the diminished economy we live in, and may well for the next several years, "value" for the buck reigns supreme.

3. That Hyundai and Kia have mastered the art of delivering so much for so little. They are to Toyota and Honda today, what Toyota and Honda were to GM, Ford and Chrysler 30 years ago.

4. That bailouts and bankruptcy for GM and Chrysler did nothing to stem their downward slide into irrelevancy. Again, I must ask, "How much longer can GM and Chrysler go without another transfusion of cash from Uncle Sam?"

5. That Cash for Clunkers cannibalized September sales, and for what purpose? C4C might have simulated car retailers while it ran, but it did nothing more than rob from future sales.

7. The Great Recession hasn't begun to turn around in spite of the happy-face bullshit the politico's and media would have us believe.

Friday, October 2, 2009

Christopher's New BMW



What good is buying a new car if you can't show it off? My friend Christopher stopped by to share his newest acquisition. We drove the twin-turbo 300 hp+ BMW like jackals through the neighborhood and beyond. Say what you will, the Germans understand performance with one of the sweetest exhaust notes I've ever heard.

That I must return to my Volvo with all of its good graces leaves me wanting.

I wish I hated cars.

Saturday, September 26, 2009

What would Frankenstein drive?



I wondered the other day what new car comes closest in design and engineering that epitomizes the automotive equivalent of Frankenstein. A little of this and a little of that and don't forget to raid the parts bin... presto, a new car! I believe it has always been in the back of my mind that the Chrysler Sebring would walk away with top honors, although the new Honda Crosstour is a nearby second.

The Sebring has been roundly trashed by most car critics for embracing every styling cliche not only within the Chrysler genetic family, but also generically available on other contemporary cars that cued up for the latest trend in sheet metal bending (remember the "Bangle-Butt").

First up, the Sebring grafts the Crossfire hood onto a plain-jane 4-door sedan. If the Crossfire had been a reasonable sales success, than there might have been a compelling argument for following suit on this mid-size masterpiece of crap. As it turned out, the Chrysler 2-seater didn't light many fires and the Sebring is following in the same unfortunate footsteps.

A traditional Chrysler grill looking especially plain and uninspired with the ubiquitous teardrop headlamp design found on most every car coming from Asia these days is nothing but common boredom. Robbing the Saturn Ion graveyard for a roof (not to worry, Saturn couldn't sell them either and had plenty to loan Chrysler) was shear laziness.

Hey! Car stylists everywhere! Want to be on the cutting edge of avant car design? Simply add a sweep-spear line to the side bodywork that plunges into the front wheel arch. I mean, if it works for Cadillac, Mercedes, Mazda, et al, than it can work for you, too.

Enhance with a harsh, noisy ride and an interior full of hard plastic with ill-fitting materials and what do you get?

Tah-Dah! The Chrysler Sebring.



Ranked dead last in Consumer Reports compilation of 39 family sedans, this meager challenger in the critical mid-size segment has sold a whopping 34,700 units to date in 2009. Compare that with the 238,000 Camrys told by Toyota and you begin to see what sloppy engineering and deplorable design begets.

This is a godawful situation, and about as comfortable for Chrysler as Hugo Chavez at a Sarah Palin family picnic. How can you succeed as a car manufacturer when your entry in the largest sales segment is woefully inadequate?

All this boils down to one thing. Can Chrysler survive until a competent replacement arrives? Do they even have the talent to do better? We will see.

In the meantime, there aren't enough Frankenstein's shopping Chrysler's dealer lots, and that could spell a funeral pyre in the months ahead.

Friday, September 25, 2009

My Tabletop Solstice



This is my first attempt at adding video to my blog. Experimenting with my Flip vc, I am thinking of all the possibilities: car shows, my travails on the Eastern Shore looking for rusty classics hidden in a garage, on-site car wreaks... you get the idea.

I shot this one Sunday afternoon. Wish I still had the real thing.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Roadside Grub Horrors #4



Denny's Meat Lovers Scramble

Who among us isn't guilty of stumbling, half-drunk, into a Denny's at 3 a.m. and ordering a heaping plate of resentment and defeat? And that’s the key to consuming sodium and cholesterol in excess of 200% of daily values - doing so with dulled senses. It's best not to be fully alert the moment you've hit rock bottom.

Tastes like: The last truck-stop meal prior to an 18-wheeler jackknife collision.

Black Bess



It's called "creative destruction" for a reason. Capitalism's mechanism for sorting out the winners from the losers has always had a rough-edged demeanor and unintended consequences. With so much talk today about which car manufacturers will, or won't, survive the current economic crisis, it brings back memories of an earlier marque that played the wrong hand.

Packard's greatness was withering by the mid-50s. A post-war reshuffling of the automotive landscape left Packard, short of sales and cash, with a shotgun wedding to Studebaker. The prospects looked grim. And yet Jim Nance, Packard's president, was still pitching a brilliant future for the manufacturer to any banker that would listen. Nance's bet was a redesigned line in 1957 that would surpass Cadillac and Lincoln. But beautifully illustrated models in a paper portfolio wouldn't cut it. Nance needed a working demo to woo the investment firms. Hence, Black Bess.

Packard had few resources in those waning days other than the styling studio. There, a cadre of loyal designers - Dick Teague, among them - continued to work on what they hoped would be the new 57s. Based on the Predictor show car, Black Bess was the working mule for a reinvigorated luxury car that would save the company.

Time was not on their side. As finances dried up in the summer of 56, Packard employees were shifted to Studebaker's South Bend, Indiana, factory. It would be the end of the line for the Packard marque at East Grand.

But what of Black Bess? This icon of hope with it's strong vertical grill flanked by slim horizontal metalwork stood for nothing now but failure. It would have to go. Packard engineer Herb Misch, who had supervised the single running prototype, asked Teague to destroy it. None of the designers had the heart to do that, so it came to Red Lux, an old welder in the studio, to do the deed. By 4 pm that day, Black Bess was no more, as was Packard's future.

Black Bess. The beauty and sadness of creative destruction.

Saturday, September 19, 2009

From Bailout to Divine Intervention




Wonderful News! I found grandmother's Faith Tones' album last week in the attic and just in a nick of time. I was getting a little jittery. I had seen where the Congressional Budget Office estimated that taxpayers would lose about $40 billion of the first $55 billion in aid to General Motors and Chrysler. I needed some reassurance from that lovely trio of beauties above that GM&C wouldn't do that.

Not if you know what a serious mess GM and Chrysler were in... and continue to be.

Let's take a realistic look at General Motors from an accounting standpoint (Chrysler was owned by private investment firm Cerberus and their numbers aren't available). I am not an accountant, but as a business man, I know something about profit and loss. Here's where it stands.

General Motors averaged a piddling profit of $1.5 billion each year from 2001 thru 2005 amounting to less than 1% of gross sales. And that's if the figures are accurate, as GM had to restate earnings for the prior 5 years after a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation in 2001.

In 2007, GM's gross sales declined to $180 billion and lost $43.3 billion ($38.3 billion was a one-time tax charge write-off).

In 2008, GM's gross sales again declined to $149 billion and lost $30.9 billion for the year with no tax write-offs. Effectively the worse 4-quarters in the 100-year history of the company.

In summation, GM's gross sales have steeply tanked for the past 10 years with a cumulative loss of over $80 billion. Market shared has collapsed as well.

So you tell me... a failing company that's made no money in a decade can pay off a tens of billions of dollars anytime soon?

I think it's going to take more than a dozen replays of the Faith Tones to make that happen.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Parts Sharing by Design



Like a lot of car buyers, I find the grill on the 2010 Fusion an attractive arrangement of the chrome 3-bar design Ford introduced on the "Interceptor" show car in 2007. That similar grill design has been the face of new Fords from the F-150s to the Flex ever since.



Originated by Peter Horbury, the 3-bar grill on the Interceptor was the talk of the Detroit auto show. Now, it appears other car makers have chosen to subjugate the design for themselves without any additional compensation to Mr. Horbury. Have you noticed yourself?



My first exhibit, and most blatant rip-off, is Lexus. Of course, Lexus' reputation for "borrowing" from other designers is now legendary. The very first Lexus LS that debuted in 1989 was a Mercedes clone from stem to stern. 20 years later, their M.O. hasn't changed. The 2010 HS Hybrid model's grill speaks for itself. Have these people no shame? Haven't they learned from history? Marilyn Monroe was the celebrated original, and maintains that status today. Her B-rated clone, Jane Mansfield, is the nobody no one remembers.



You would think one rip-off would be enough in the automotive design universe. But no, along comes Honda with their hideous "CrossTour" and presto, here's the Ford 3-bar grill again, albeit with blackened bars. Of course, Honda has demonstrated their engineering acumen since they arrived in the U.S. 50 years ago, but their design aesthetic is a language nobody speaks. Honda doesn't build beautiful cars today, and never has.

I know how it feels to have one's ideas or artwork appropriated by less creative individuals. But on the broad stage of automotive design, must Toyota and Honda be so fucking brazen about it?

While I think the buyers of the copycats may never conceptually put two and two together, if I were Peter Horbury, I'd be readying an invoice for the two imitators before they move on and cannibalize another competitor's design.